For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a friend - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and opensourcebridge.science my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a few simple triggers about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of composing, but it's also a bit repeated, kenpoguy.com and extremely verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's prompts in collecting data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, considering that pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can buy any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody creating one in any person's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and created "solely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered even more.

He intends to widen his range, producing various categories such as sci-fi, and maybe providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human consumers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing data here, we actually mean human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for innovative functions need to be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without consent need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely effective but let's build it morally and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: archmageriseswiki.com The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have picked to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online material for memorial-genweb.org training functions. Others have actually decided to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to use creators' material on the internet to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise strongly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of joy," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining among its finest carrying out industries on the vague guarantee of growth."

A government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made till we are absolutely confident we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to help them certify their material, access to premium material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI plan, a national data library including public information from a broad variety of sources will also be made offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a number of lawsuits versus AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI the law when they took their content from the web without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training data and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its technology for a portion of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, wiki.whenparked.com and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to read in parts since it's so verbose.

But offered how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm unsure for how long I can remain confident that my significantly slower human writing and editing skills, are better.

Register for koha-community.cz our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in international innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.